X-7257233-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001320752.2(STS):c.138-9T>G variant causes a splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000992 in 1,209,286 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 5 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001320752.2 splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STS | NM_001320752.2 | c.138-9T>G | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000674429.1 | NP_001307681.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STS | ENST00000674429.1 | c.138-9T>G | splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | NM_001320752.2 | ENSP00000501534 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000177 AC: 2AN: 112856Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 35006
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000164 AC: 3AN: 182866Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000148 AC XY: 1AN XY: 67470
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000912 AC: 10AN: 1096430Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000138 AC XY: 5AN XY: 362560
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000177 AC: 2AN: 112856Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 35006
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at