X-78045547-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000341514.11(ATP7A):āc.4201G>Cā(p.Val1401Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000847 in 1,208,322 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. There are 258 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1401E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000341514.11 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP7A | NM_000052.7 | c.4201G>C | p.Val1401Leu | missense_variant | 22/23 | ENST00000341514.11 | NP_000043.4 | |
ATP7A | NM_001282224.2 | c.3967G>C | p.Val1323Leu | missense_variant | 21/22 | NP_001269153.1 | ||
ATP7A | NR_104109.2 | n.1374G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP7A | ENST00000341514.11 | c.4201G>C | p.Val1401Leu | missense_variant | 22/23 | 1 | NM_000052.7 | ENSP00000345728 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00446 AC: 502AN: 112431Hom.: 2 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00373 AC XY: 129AN XY: 34605
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00122 AC: 224AN: 182986Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000755 AC XY: 51AN XY: 67536
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000475 AC: 520AN: 1095839Hom.: 2 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000354 AC XY: 128AN XY: 361277
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00447 AC: 503AN: 112483Hom.: 2 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00375 AC XY: 130AN XY: 34667
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 05, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 19, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Menkes kinky-hair syndrome;C0268353:Cutis laxa, X-linked;C1845359:X-linked distal spinal muscular atrophy type 3 Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Sep 27, 2021 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 07, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at