chr1-114713865-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP3BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002524.5(NRAS):​c.225C>T​(p.Gly75Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0002 in 1,613,638 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G75G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NRAS
NM_002524.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.485

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NRAS (HGNC:7989): (NRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase) This is an N-ras oncogene encoding a membrane protein that shuttles between the Golgi apparatus and the plasma membrane. This shuttling is regulated through palmitoylation and depalmitoylation by the ZDHHC9-GOLGA7 complex. The encoded protein, which has intrinsic GTPase activity, is activated by a guanine nucleotide-exchange factor and inactivated by a GTPase activating protein. Mutations in this gene have been associated with somatic rectal cancer, follicular thyroid cancer, autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, Noonan syndrome, and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2011]
NRAS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Noonan syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Noonan syndrome 6
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
  • cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen
  • Costello syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

PP3
Splicing predictors support a deleterious effect. Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.
BP6
Variant 1-114713865-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-114713865-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 178104.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00106 (162/152170) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00383 (159/41502). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00334. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 61 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 162 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NRASNM_002524.5 linkc.225C>T p.Gly75Gly synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 7 ENST00000369535.5 NP_002515.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NRASENST00000369535.5 linkc.225C>T p.Gly75Gly synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 7 1 NM_002524.5 ENSP00000358548.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00107
AC:
163
AN:
152052
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00387
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000298
AC:
75
AN:
251478
AF XY:
0.000235
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00394
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000110
AC:
161
AN:
1461468
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000963
AC XY:
70
AN XY:
727066
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00344
AC:
115
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000224
AC:
10
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000104
AC:
9
AN:
86244
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000693
AC:
4
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000630
AC:
7
AN:
1111640
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000265
AC:
16
AN:
60380
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
16
24
32
40
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00106
AC:
162
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000820
AC XY:
61
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00383
AC:
159
AN:
41502
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10592
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
16
23
31
39
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000971
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00118
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 15, 2015
Greenwood Genetic Center Diagnostic Laboratories, Greenwood Genetic Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 29, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:2
Mar 19, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Gly75Gly in Exon 03 of NRAS: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.3% (10/3738) of Afri can American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing P roject (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs142739534).

Aug 03, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: NRAS c.225C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Four predict the variant creates a 5 donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0003 in 251478 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0039 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1560 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NRAS causing Noonan Syndrome phenotype (2.5e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.225C>T in individuals affected with Noonan Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four other ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign/likely benign (n=3) or uncertain significance (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

NRAS-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 15, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Noonan syndrome 6 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 24, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

RASopathy Benign:1
Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Benign
0.77
PhyloP100
-0.48
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.72
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.72
Position offset: 2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142739534; hg19: chr1-115256486; COSMIC: COSV54737042; COSMIC: COSV54737042; API