chr1-11970732-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP6BP7
The ENST00000196061.5(PLOD1):c.1818C>A(p.Ile606=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000123 in 1,612,414 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I606I) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000196061.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOD1 | NM_000302.4 | c.1818C>A | p.Ile606= | synonymous_variant | 17/19 | ENST00000196061.5 | NP_000293.2 | |
PLOD1 | NM_001316320.2 | c.1959C>A | p.Ile653= | synonymous_variant | 18/20 | NP_001303249.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLOD1 | ENST00000196061.5 | c.1818C>A | p.Ile606= | synonymous_variant | 17/19 | 1 | NM_000302.4 | ENSP00000196061 | P1 | |
PLOD1 | ENST00000491536.5 | n.383+3641C>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000795 AC: 12AN: 150920Hom.: 0 Cov.: 27
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000108 AC: 27AN: 250938Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135836
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000127 AC: 186AN: 1461494Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000128 AC XY: 93AN XY: 727040
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000795 AC: 12AN: 150920Hom.: 0 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.0000816 AC XY: 6AN XY: 73534
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 01, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2023 | PLOD1: BP7 - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 03, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at