chr1-1213065-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_003327.4(TNFRSF4):c.297C>T(p.Cys99Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0217 in 1,610,736 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 445 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003327.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- combined immunodeficiency due to OX40 deficiencyInheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003327.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNFRSF4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.297C>T | p.Cys99Cys | synonymous | Exon 3 of 7 | ENSP00000368538.3 | P43489 | ||
| TNFRSF4 | c.297C>T | p.Cys99Cys | synonymous | Exon 3 of 6 | ENSP00000514728.1 | A0A8V8TP52 | |||
| TNFRSF4 | c.297C>T | p.Cys99Cys | synonymous | Exon 3 of 6 | ENSP00000514730.1 | A0A8V8TQH5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0157 AC: 2394AN: 152202Hom.: 31 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0169 AC: 4031AN: 238318 AF XY: 0.0171 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0223 AC: 32553AN: 1458416Hom.: 414 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0218 AC XY: 15792AN XY: 725508 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0157 AC: 2394AN: 152320Hom.: 31 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0161 AC XY: 1197AN XY: 74486 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at