chr1-147908521-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_Strong
The NM_005267.5(GJA8):c.566C>T(p.Pro189Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P189A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005267.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA8 | NM_005267.5 | c.566C>T | p.Pro189Leu | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000369235.2 | |
GJA8 | XM_011509417.3 | c.566C>T | p.Pro189Leu | missense_variant | 1/2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA8 | ENST00000369235.2 | c.566C>T | p.Pro189Leu | missense_variant | 2/2 | NM_005267.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cataract 1 multiple types Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Dept. Genetics and Cancer, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania | Jan 21, 2023 | Variant identified and curated during a GJA8 specific review of the literature in relation to pediatric or congenital cataract. ACMG-AMP criteria applied: PM2(Supporting), PP3. Original variant report: PMID:17724170. Gene review and curation guidelines are outlined in: https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2023.2160320 - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Sep 01, 2007 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at