chr1-150553568-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_019032.6(ADAMTSL4):āc.577G>Cā(p.Ala193Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.527 in 1,613,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 225,534 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_019032.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMTSL4 | NM_019032.6 | c.577G>C | p.Ala193Pro | missense_variant | 6/19 | ENST00000271643.9 | NP_061905.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMTSL4 | ENST00000271643.9 | c.577G>C | p.Ala193Pro | missense_variant | 6/19 | 5 | NM_019032.6 | ENSP00000271643.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.542 AC: 81953AN: 151122Hom.: 22461 Cov.: 28
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.522 AC: 131133AN: 251424Hom.: 34885 AF XY: 0.513 AC XY: 69684AN XY: 135894
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.525 AC: 767392AN: 1461832Hom.: 203049 Cov.: 73 AF XY: 0.519 AC XY: 377632AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.542 AC: 82024AN: 151240Hom.: 22485 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.545 AC XY: 40269AN XY: 73830
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 20, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Ectopia lentis 2, isolated, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Ectopia lentis et pupillae Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at