chr1-158677841-T-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_003126.4(SPTA1):​c.813-7A>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.99 in 1,613,432 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 791,166 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.96 ( 70103 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.99 ( 721063 hom. )

Consequence

SPTA1
NM_003126.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001651
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.34

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPTA1 (HGNC:11272): (spectrin alpha, erythrocytic 1) This gene encodes a member of a family of molecular scaffold proteins that link the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton and functions in the determination of cell shape, arrangement of transmembrane proteins, and organization of organelles. The encoded protein is primarily composed of 22 spectrin repeats which are involved in dimer formation. It forms a component of the erythrocyte plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene result in a variety of hereditary red blood cell disorders, including elliptocytosis-2, pyropoikilocytosis, and spherocytosis, type 3. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
SPTA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary spherocytosis type 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • elliptocytosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • pyropoikilocytosis, hereditary
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary elliptocytosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary spherocytosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 1-158677841-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-158677841-T-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 258959.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.991 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SPTA1NM_003126.4 linkc.813-7A>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 6 of 51 ENST00000643759.2 NP_003117.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SPTA1ENST00000643759.2 linkc.813-7A>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 6 of 51 NM_003126.4 ENSP00000495214.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.958
AC:
145688
AN:
152044
Hom.:
70051
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.864
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.970
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.984
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.998
Gnomad EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.998
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.983
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.987
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.997
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.968
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.987
AC:
245553
AN:
248822
AF XY:
0.989
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.858
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.992
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.999
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.985
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.996
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.993
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.993
AC:
1451333
AN:
1461270
Hom.:
721063
Cov.:
57
AF XY:
0.994
AC XY:
722476
AN XY:
726954
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.862
AC:
28799
AN:
33426
American (AMR)
AF:
0.990
AC:
44251
AN:
44684
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.999
AC:
26076
AN:
26106
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
39687
AN:
39688
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.999
AC:
86187
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.986
AC:
52659
AN:
53406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.989
AC:
5685
AN:
5750
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.997
AC:
1108358
AN:
1111616
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.988
AC:
59631
AN:
60348
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
509
1018
1528
2037
2546
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21662
43324
64986
86648
108310
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.958
AC:
145797
AN:
152162
Hom.:
70103
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.960
AC XY:
71410
AN XY:
74376
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.864
AC:
35841
AN:
41470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.984
AC:
15022
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.998
AC:
3465
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
5172
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.998
AC:
4810
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.983
AC:
10439
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.983
AC:
289
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.997
AC:
67826
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.969
AC:
2048
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
273
545
818
1090
1363
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
912
1824
2736
3648
4560
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.990
Hom.:
18958
Bravo
AF:
0.954
Asia WGS
AF:
0.993
AC:
3453
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.998
EpiControl
AF:
0.998

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 09, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 29, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:3
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Elliptocytosis 2 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary spherocytosis type 3 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Pyropoikilocytosis, hereditary Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
7.8
DANN
Benign
0.49
PhyloP100
3.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000017
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs325995; hg19: chr1-158647631; API