chr1-161305308-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000530.8(MPZ):​c.*568C>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0116 in 156,866 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 42 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00043 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MPZ
NM_000530.8 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.926
Variant links:
Genes affected
MPZ (HGNC:7225): (myelin protein zero) This gene is specifically expressed in Schwann cells of the peripheral nervous system and encodes a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that is a major structural protein of the peripheral myelin sheath. The encoded protein contains a large hydrophobic extracellular domain and a smaller basic intracellular domain, which are essential for the formation and stabilization of the multilamellar structure of the compact myelin. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal dominant form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 (CMT1B) and other polyneuropathies, such as Dejerine-Sottas syndrome (DSS) and congenital hypomyelinating neuropathy (CHN). A recent study showed that two isoforms are produced from the same mRNA by use of alternative in-frame translation termination codons via a stop codon readthrough mechanism. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 1-161305308-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-161305308-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 293308.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0119 (1818/152238) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.039 (1618/41516). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0374. There are 42 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 873 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1818 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MPZNM_000530.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.*568C>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 6/6 ENST00000533357.5 NP_000521.2
MPZNM_001315491.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.*376C>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 6/6 NP_001302420.1
MPZXM_017001321.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.675+800C>G intron_variant XP_016856810.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MPZENST00000533357.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*568C>G 3_prime_UTR_variant 6/61 NM_000530.8 ENSP00000432943 P1P25189-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0119
AC:
1817
AN:
152120
Hom.:
42
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0390
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00717
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000432
AC:
2
AN:
4628
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.000763
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
2620
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00625
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0119
AC:
1818
AN:
152238
Hom.:
42
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0117
AC XY:
873
AN XY:
74426
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0390
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00710
Alfa
AF:
0.00971
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.0141
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Roussy-Lévy syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Neuropathy, congenital hypomyelinating, 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 13, 2021- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4E Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
7.3
DANN
Benign
0.58
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.3

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs60731755; hg19: chr1-161275098; API