chr1-171635976-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1464C>T variant in MYOC is a synonymous variant (p.Ala488=). The highest minor allele frequency of this variant was in the East Asian population of gnomAD (v2.1.1) = 0.001253, which met the ≥ 0.001 threshold set for BS1 (25 alleles out of 19,950), meeting the threshold of ≥ 5 of at least 2,000 observed alleles). Although this synonymous variant was not predicted to affect splicing, as assessed with SpliceAI (≤ 0.2), it had a CADD score (v1.6) = 10.96, which did not meet the ≤ 10 threshold for BP4 and a GERP score = 2.87 (threshold < 0), not meeting BP7 and indicating conservation at this site. There was no functional evidence predicting a damaging or benign impact of this variant on MYOC function. As BS1 was met, PP1 did not apply and segregations were not counted. Although probands with primary open angle glaucoma have been reported carrying this variant, PM2_Supporting was not met, therefore PS4 did not apply. In summary, this variant met the criteria to receive a score of -4 and to be classified as likely benign (likely benign classification range -2 to -6) for primary open angle glaucoma based on the ACMG/AMP criteria met, as specified by the ClinGen Glaucoma VCEP (v1, 12 Oct 2021): BS1. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA1244015/MONDO:0007665/019
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000261.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYOC | NM_000261.2 | c.1464C>T | p.Ala488= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000037502.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYOC | ENST00000037502.11 | c.1464C>T | p.Ala488= | synonymous_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_000261.2 | P1 | |
MYOCOS | ENST00000637303.1 | c.235-2654G>A | intron_variant | 5 | A2 | ||||
MYOC | ENST00000638471.1 | c.*802C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 4/4 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152138Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000103 AC: 26AN: 251406Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000957 AC XY: 13AN XY: 135880
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000132 AC: 193AN: 1461886Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000124 AC XY: 90AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152256Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74456
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Open-angle glaucoma Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Glaucoma Variant Curation Expert Panel | May 02, 2023 | The c.1464C>T variant in MYOC is a synonymous variant (p.Ala488=). The highest minor allele frequency of this variant was in the East Asian population of gnomAD (v2.1.1) = 0.001253, which met the >=0.001 threshold set for BS1 (25 alleles out of 19,950), meeting the threshold of >=5 of at least 2,000 observed alleles). Although this synonymous variant was not predicted to affect splicing, as assessed with SpliceAI (<=0.2), it had a CADD score (v1.6) = 10.96, which did not meet the <=10 threshold for BP4 and a GERP score = 2.87 (threshold < 0), not meeting BP7 and indicating conservation at this site. There was no functional evidence predicting a damaging or benign impact of this variant on MYOC function. As BS1 was met, PP1 did not apply and segregations were not counted. Although probands with primary open angle glaucoma have been reported carrying this variant, PM2_Supporting was not met, therefore PS4 did not apply. In summary, this variant met the criteria to receive a score of -4 and to be classified as likely benign (likely benign classification range -2 to -6) for primary open angle glaucoma based on the ACMG/AMP criteria met, as specified by the ClinGen Glaucoma VCEP (v1, 12 Oct 2021): BS1. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at