chr1-193233023-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_024529.5(CDC73):ā€‹c.1185A>Gā€‹(p.Gln395Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000901 in 1,614,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0047 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00051 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

CDC73
NM_024529.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.61
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDC73 (HGNC:16783): (cell division cycle 73) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor that is involved in transcriptional and post-transcriptional control pathways. The protein is a component of the the PAF protein complex, which associates with the RNA polymerase II subunit POLR2A and with a histone methyltransferase complex. This protein appears to facilitate the association of 3' mRNA processing factors with actively-transcribed chromatin. Mutations in this gene have been linked to hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome, familial isolated hyperparathyroidism, and parathyroid carcinoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 1-193233023-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-193233023-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 241491.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.61 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00466 (710/152356) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0161 (668/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0151. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 331 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 710 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDC73NM_024529.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1185A>G p.Gln395Gln synonymous_variant 14/17 ENST00000367435.5 NP_078805.3 Q6P1J9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDC73ENST00000367435.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1185A>G p.Gln395Gln synonymous_variant 14/171 NM_024529.5 ENSP00000356405.4 Q6P1J9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00466
AC:
710
AN:
152238
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00190
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00430
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
291
AN:
251288
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000869
AC XY:
118
AN XY:
135826
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000781
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000440
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000510
AC:
745
AN:
1461646
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000461
AC XY:
335
AN XY:
727146
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000899
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00466
AC:
710
AN:
152356
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00444
AC XY:
331
AN XY:
74516
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00189
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00425
Alfa
AF:
0.00226
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00536
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 17, 2018This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20052758) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 28, 2016Variant summary: The c.1185A>G in CDC73 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 splice-site tools in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.16%, predominantly in individuals of African descent (1.7%), including one homozygote. The observed frequency greatly exceeds the maximum expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant of 0.00041%, suggesting that it is a benign polymorphism. The variant of interest has been reported polymorphism in published report(s) (Newey, 2010). Taken together, based on the prevalence in general population the variant was classified as Benign. -
Parathyroid carcinoma Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hyperparathyroidism 2 with jaw tumors Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 02, 2021- -
Hyperparathyroidism 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 01, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
3.3
DANN
Benign
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.19
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116358657; hg19: chr1-193202153; API