chr1-197086795-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_018136.5(ASPM):c.10331+8A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.885 in 1,591,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 632,356 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018136.5 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | NM_018136.5 | c.10331+8A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000367409.9 | |||
ASPM | NM_001206846.2 | c.5576+8A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | ENST00000367409.9 | c.10331+8A>G | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_018136.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.784 AC: 119202AN: 152018Hom.: 49988 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.888 AC: 222168AN: 250278Hom.: 100509 AF XY: 0.894 AC XY: 121046AN XY: 135378
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.896 AC: 1290168AN: 1439718Hom.: 582345 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.898 AC XY: 644244AN XY: 717764
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.784 AC: 119275AN: 152136Hom.: 50011 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.789 AC XY: 58661AN XY: 74372
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 16, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 02, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at