chr1-201361375-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001276345.2(TNNT2):c.720-6G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000372 in 1,613,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000037 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

TNNT2
NM_001276345.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.00005726

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.27

Variant links:

Genes affected

TNNT2 (HGNC:11949): (troponin T2, cardiac type) This gene encodes the cardiac isoform of troponin T. The encoded protein is the tropomyosin-binding subunit of the troponin complex, which is located on the thin filament of striated muscles and regulates muscle contraction in response to alterations in intracellular calcium ion concentration. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as well as with dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TNNT2 links:

ENSG00000286600 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000286600 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).

BP6

Variant 1-201361375-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-201361375-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43665.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Benign=1, Likely_benign=3}. Variant chr1-201361375-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TNNT2	NM_001276345.2 link	c.720-6G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 16	ENST00000656932.1	NP_001263274.1	P45379-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TNNT2	ENST00000656932.1 link	c.720-6G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 16		NM_001276345.2	ENSP00000499593.1		P45379-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000159

AC:

AN:

251442

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000221

AC XY:

AN XY:

135898

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000370

AC:

AN:

1461318

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000454

AC XY:

AN XY:

727008

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000375

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000171

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000315

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000671

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000283

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000340

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 08, 2015	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Nov 19, 2019	Variant summary: TNNT2 c.690-6G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 251442 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.690-6G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with dilated- and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Morales_2010, Pugh_2014). These reports however, do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with the disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and both of them classified the variant as benign (1x) or likely benign (1x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Oct 22, 2019	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health	Jan 03, 2024	- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1D

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 28, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Feb 07, 2023

The c.690-6G>A variant in TNNT2 has been identified in 2 individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) who also carried a potentially disease-causing variant in TNNT2, which was confirmed in cis in one of these individuals, as well as 1 individual with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM; Morales 2010 PMID: 20973921, Ntusi 2016 PMID: 27841901, LMM data). This variant has also been reported by other clinical laboratories in ClinVar (Variation ID 43665) and has been identified in 0.00065% (1/15284) of Latino chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org, v.3.2.1). This variant is located in the 3' splice region. Computational tools do not suggest an impact to splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, while the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BP2, PM2_Supporting. -

Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 3

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 28, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 28, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1D;C1861864:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 2;C2676271:Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 3

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 29, 2025

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.91

CADD

Benign

0.56

DANN

Benign

0.44

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.000057

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0060

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over