chr1-204162135-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 10P and 4B. PVS1PP5_ModerateBS2
The NM_000537.4(REN):c.127C>T(p.Arg43Ter) variant causes a stop gained change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000161 in 1,613,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★). Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000537.4 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REN | NM_000537.4 | c.127C>T | p.Arg43Ter | stop_gained | 2/10 | ENST00000272190.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REN | ENST00000272190.9 | c.127C>T | p.Arg43Ter | stop_gained | 2/10 | 1 | NM_000537.4 | P1 | |
REN | ENST00000638118.1 | c.13C>T | p.Arg5Ter | stop_gained | 4/12 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251356Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135850
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000150 AC: 22AN: 1461866Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152126Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74302
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy type 2;C5681536:Renal tubular dysgenesis of genetic origin Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Apr 05, 2022 | - - |
Renal tubular dysgenesis Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Feb 01, 2012 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at