chr1-231942868-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_018662.3(DISC1):c.1982-15960T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.194 in 152,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,701 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018662.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_018662.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISC1 | NM_018662.3 | MANE Select | c.1982-15960T>C | intron | N/A | NP_061132.2 | |||
| DISC1 | NM_001164537.2 | c.2078-15960T>C | intron | N/A | NP_001158009.1 | ||||
| DISC1 | NM_001012957.2 | c.1982-15960T>C | intron | N/A | NP_001012975.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISC1 | ENST00000439617.8 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.1982-15960T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000403888.4 | |||
| DISC1 | ENST00000366637.8 | TSL:5 | c.1982-15960T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000355597.6 | |||
| DISC1 | ENST00000535983.5 | TSL:1 | c.1982-65917T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000443996.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.194 AC: 29443AN: 151990Hom.: 3697 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.194 AC: 29463AN: 152108Hom.: 3701 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.200 AC XY: 14907AN XY: 74354 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at