chr1-234231548-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_173508.4(SLC35F3):c.415G>A(p.Val139Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000898 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V139L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_173508.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC35F3 | NM_173508.4 | c.415G>A | p.Val139Met | missense_variant | 3/8 | ENST00000366618.8 | |
SLC35F3 | NM_001300845.2 | c.208G>A | p.Val70Met | missense_variant | 2/7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC35F3 | ENST00000366618.8 | c.415G>A | p.Val139Met | missense_variant | 3/8 | 2 | NM_173508.4 | ||
SLC35F3 | ENST00000366617.3 | c.208G>A | p.Val70Met | missense_variant | 2/7 | 1 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000539 AC: 82AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000144 AC: 36AN: 250528Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135546
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000431 AC: 63AN: 1461796Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000371 AC XY: 27AN XY: 727212
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000538 AC: 82AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000376 AC XY: 28AN XY: 74492
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 08, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at