chr1-235661665-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_000081.4(LYST):c.*1275T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00351 in 152,364 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
LYST
NM_000081.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_000081.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.310
Genes affected
LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 1-235661665-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-235661665-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 296326.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00351 (535/152364) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0299 (458/15312). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0276. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 302 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYST | NM_000081.4 | c.*1275T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 53/53 | ENST00000389793.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYST | ENST00000389793.7 | c.*1275T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 53/53 | 5 | NM_000081.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00347 AC: 529AN: 152246Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
529
AN:
152246
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 436Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 262
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
436
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
262
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00351 AC: 535AN: 152364Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00405 AC XY: 302AN XY: 74514
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
535
AN:
152364
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
302
AN XY:
74514
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
29
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Chédiak-Higashi syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at