chr1-235731066-A-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000081.4(LYST):​c.8913T>G​(p.Asn2971Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00407 in 1,613,680 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0042 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

LYST
NM_000081.4 missense

Scores

5
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.21
Variant links:
Genes affected
LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), LYST. . Trascript score misZ 4.0845 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, attenuated Chédiak-Higashi syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.02045229).
BP6
Variant 1-235731066-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-235731066-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 525179.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=6}. Variant chr1-235731066-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00259 (394/152290) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00447 (304/68008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00406. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 169 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 15 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
LYSTNM_000081.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.8913T>G p.Asn2971Lys missense_variant 35/53 ENST00000389793.7 NP_000072.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LYSTENST00000389793.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.8913T>G p.Asn2971Lys missense_variant 35/535 NM_000081.4 ENSP00000374443 P1Q99698-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00259
AC:
394
AN:
152172
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00879
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00447
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00244
AC:
614
AN:
251384
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00246
AC XY:
334
AN XY:
135856
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000861
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00218
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00444
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00422
AC:
6166
AN:
1461390
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00412
AC XY:
2994
AN XY:
727052
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00521
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00259
AC:
394
AN:
152290
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00227
AC XY:
169
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00447
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00415
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00275
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00405
AC:
15
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00441
AC:
17
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00372
AC:
32
ExAC
AF:
0.00216
AC:
262
EpiCase
AF:
0.00485
EpiControl
AF:
0.00468

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 14, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 27, 2019Identified as a single heterozygous variant in two individuals with fatal H1N1 influenza and identified with another LYST variant in another individual with cerebellar ataxia, but limited phenotypic information was provided on these individuals (Schulert et al., 2016; Coutelier et al., 2018); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29482223, 26597256) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2019- -
Chédiak-Higashi syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoAug 30, 2022LYST NM_000081.3 exon 35 p.Asn2971Lys (c.8913T>G): This variant has been reported in the literature in at least 1 individual with cerebellar ataxia (Coutelier 2018 PMID:29482223). This variant is present in 0.4% (580/129120) of European alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/1-235894366-A-C). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:525179). Evolutionary conservation suggests that this variant may impact the protein; computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 10, 2023Variant summary: LYST c.8913T>G (p.Asn2971Lys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0024 in 251384 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 2.18 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in LYST causing Chediak-Higashi Syndrome phenotype (0.0011), suggesting that the variant is benign. c.8913T>G has been reported in the literature in settings of whole exome or multigene panel testing in individuals affected with clinical features that have been reported in Chediak-Higashi Syndrome, including cerebellar ataxia, reported as a VUS with compound heterozygous genotype (e.g.Coutelier_2018), fatal H1N1, reported as a VUS in a heterozygous genotype (e.g. Schulert_2016), unspecified inherited bleeding disorder with unspecified genotype (e.g. Leinoe_2017), and unclassified neuroinflammatory disease with isolated incidence of hemiplegia and ataxia as a compound heterozygous genotype with variants in multiple neuroinflammatory genes (e.g.McCreary_2019). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Chediak-Higashi Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 29482223, 28748566, 31664448, 26597256). Eight submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, classifying the variant as uncertain significance (n=5) or likely benign (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 08, 2021- -
Autoinflammatory syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJun 01, 2019- -
LYST-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 12, 2021This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.33
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.42
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.12
T
Eigen
Benign
0.022
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.064
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.89
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.039
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.020
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.72
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.99
N
REVEL
Benign
0.096
Sift
Benign
0.66
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.054
T
Polyphen
0.90
P
Vest4
0.74
MutPred
0.41
Gain of methylation at N2971 (P = 0.0065);
MVP
0.66
ClinPred
0.030
T
GERP RS
2.1
Varity_R
0.16
gMVP
0.67

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34702903; hg19: chr1-235894366; API