chr1-235775029-A-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000081.4(LYST):​c.5518T>G​(p.Ser1840Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00721 in 1,611,734 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S1840L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0048 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0075 ( 58 hom. )

Consequence

LYST
NM_000081.4 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.94
Variant links:
Genes affected
LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), LYST. . Trascript score misZ 4.0845 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, attenuated Chédiak-Higashi syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009067118).
BP6
Variant 1-235775029-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-235775029-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 235239.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=3}. Variant chr1-235775029-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00477 (726/152290) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00792 (539/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00737. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 315 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
LYSTNM_000081.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5518T>G p.Ser1840Ala missense_variant 18/53 ENST00000389793.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
LYSTENST00000389793.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.5518T>G p.Ser1840Ala missense_variant 18/535 NM_000081.4 P1Q99698-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00477
AC:
726
AN:
152172
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00224
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00768
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00792
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00439
AC:
1099
AN:
250356
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00435
AC XY:
589
AN XY:
135376
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00142
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00497
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000940
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00749
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00459
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00747
AC:
10900
AN:
1459444
Hom.:
58
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00725
AC XY:
5265
AN XY:
726190
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00204
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00509
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00899
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00635
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00477
AC:
726
AN:
152290
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00423
AC XY:
315
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00224
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00792
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.00695
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.00454
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00674
AC:
25
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0119
AC:
46
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00182
AC:
8
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00826
AC:
71
ExAC
AF:
0.00460
AC:
559
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3472
EpiCase
AF:
0.00704
EpiControl
AF:
0.00705

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Chédiak-Higashi syndrome Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoAug 23, 2022This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in the Genome Aggregation Database (Highest reported MAF 0.7% (539/68038) including 2 homozygotes (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/1-235775029-A-C?dataset=gnomad_r3). This variant is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as Benign or Likely benign (Variation ID:235239). This variant amino acid Alanine (Ala) is present in multiple species including at least one mammal and is not well conserved among evolutionarily distant species; this suggests that this variant may not impact the protein. Additional computational prediction tools do not suggest an impact. In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease but requires further evidence. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingJohns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins UniversityAug 17, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterNov 15, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsMay 09, 2016- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2023LYST: BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 19, 2020- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoNov 04, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Autoinflammatory syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJun 25, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.079
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.17
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.19
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.086
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.63
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.024
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0091
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.89
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.51
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N
REVEL
Benign
0.089
Sift
Benign
0.35
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.017
D
Polyphen
0.0010
B
Vest4
0.43
MVP
0.62
ClinPred
0.014
T
GERP RS
4.1
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.19

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115330112; hg19: chr1-235938329; API