chr1-243256076-C-T

Variant names:

• chr1-243256076-C-T
• rs886046329
• NM_006642.5:c.-98C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_Strong BS1_Supporting

The NM_006642.5(SDCCAG8):​c.-98C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000515 in 1,125,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 (0 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000056 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: SDCCAG8 NM_006642.5 5_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.17
• Publications: 1 publications found

Genes affected

SDCCAG8 (HGNC:10671): (SHH signaling and ciliogenesis regulator SDCCAG8) This gene encodes a centrosome associated protein. This protein may be involved in organizing the centrosome during interphase and mitosis. Mutations in this gene are associated with retinal-renal ciliopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2010]

SDCCAG8 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

• Senior-Loken syndrome 7

  Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
• Bardet-Biedl syndrome 16

  Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
• Bardet-Biedl syndrome

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Senior-Loken syndrome

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ACMG classification

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000565 (55/973684) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.000667 (51/76474). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000521. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 45 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 14. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SDCCAG8	NM_006642.5	c.-98C>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 18	ENST00000366541.8	NP_006633.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SDCCAG8	ENST00000366541.8	c.-98C>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 18	1	NM_006642.5	ENSP00000355499.3
SDCCAG8	ENST00000490065.5	n.43C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 5	4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3 AN: 152246 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000621

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000565 AC: 55 AN: 973684 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 14 AF XY: 0.0000891 AC XY: 45 AN XY: 504886

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 24032

American (AMR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 44106

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 23192

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 37496

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.000667 AC: 51 AN: 76474

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 52078

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 4794

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.00000450 AC: 3 AN: 667228

Other (OTH) AF: 0.0000226 AC: 1 AN: 44284

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3 AN: 152246 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2 AN XY: 74376

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 41474

American (AMR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 3470

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 5194

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.000621 AC: 3 AN: 4828

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 10626

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 314

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 68042

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 2094

Alfa AF: 0.00 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Senior-Loken syndrome 7 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 16 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.60
CADD	Benign	17
DANN	Benign	0.87
PhyloP100		1.2
PromoterAI		0.40	Neutral

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs886046329; hg19: chr1-243419378;