chr1-243286398-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PVS1_ModeratePM2PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_006642.5(SDCCAG8):c.546+1G>A variant causes a splice donor, intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000496 in 1,613,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006642.5 splice_donor, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Senior-Loken syndrome 7Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Bardet-Biedl syndrome 16Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
- Bardet-Biedl syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Senior-Loken syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006642.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDCCAG8 | NM_006642.5 | MANE Select | c.546+1G>A | splice_donor intron | N/A | NP_006633.1 | |||
| SDCCAG8 | NM_001350248.2 | c.546+1G>A | splice_donor intron | N/A | NP_001337177.1 | ||||
| SDCCAG8 | NM_001350249.2 | c.252+1G>A | splice_donor intron | N/A | NP_001337178.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDCCAG8 | ENST00000366541.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.546+1G>A | splice_donor intron | N/A | ENSP00000355499.3 | |||
| SDCCAG8 | ENST00000435549.1 | TSL:1 | c.15+1G>A | splice_donor intron | N/A | ENSP00000410200.1 | |||
| SDCCAG8 | ENST00000476722.6 | TSL:3 | c.42+1G>A | splice_donor intron | N/A | ENSP00000473868.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000120 AC: 3AN: 250870 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1461526Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727068 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74376 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Senior-Loken syndrome 7;C3889474:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 16 Pathogenic:2
This sequence change affects a donor splice site in intron 5 of the SDCCAG8 gene. It is expected to disrupt RNA splicing and likely results in an absent or disrupted protein product. This variant is present in population databases (rs756907665, ExAC 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with SDCCAG8-related disease. Donor and acceptor splice site variants typically lead to a loss of protein function (PMID: 16199547), and loss-of-function variants in SDCCAG8 are known to be pathogenic (PMID: 20835237). In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic.
SDCCAG8-related disorder Pathogenic:1
The SDCCAG8 c.546+1G>A variant is predicted to disrupt the GT donor site and interfere with normal splicing. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.0063% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD. Based on the available evidence, we consider the SDCCAG8 c.546+1G>A variant to be likely pathogenic.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at