chr1-26023313-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_004455.3(EXTL1):c.667G>C(p.Gly223Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000129 in 1,551,772 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Uncertain significance in ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004455.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004455.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXTL1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.667G>C | p.Gly223Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 11 | ENSP00000363398.3 | Q92935 | ||
| EXTL1 | c.667G>C | p.Gly223Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 11 | ENSP00000552680.1 | ||||
| EXTL1 | c.667G>C | p.Gly223Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 10 | ENSP00000552675.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000520 AC: 1AN: 192124 AF XY: 0.00000969 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.15e-7 AC: 1AN: 1399540Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000145 AC XY: 1AN XY: 688546 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74376 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at