chr1-26426501-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_024674.6(LIN28A):c.*43T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.808 in 1,546,482 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 505,506 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024674.6 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024674.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN28A | NM_024674.6 | MANE Select | c.*43T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 4 of 4 | NP_078950.1 | Q9H9Z2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN28A | ENST00000326279.11 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*43T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000363314.3 | Q9H9Z2 | ||
| LIN28A | ENST00000254231.4 | TSL:1 | c.*43T>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 4 of 5 | ENSP00000254231.4 | Q9H9Z2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.819 AC: 124621AN: 152122Hom.: 51181 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.831 AC: 196379AN: 236428 AF XY: 0.828 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.807 AC: 1124661AN: 1394242Hom.: 454280 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.808 AC XY: 562425AN XY: 696490 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.819 AC: 124726AN: 152240Hom.: 51226 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.822 AC XY: 61205AN XY: 74444 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at