chr1-29120913-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_001003682.4(TMEM200B):c.916C>T(p.Arg306Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000579 in 1,602,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R306P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001003682.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001003682.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMEM200B | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.916C>T | p.Arg306Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000428459.1 | Q69YZ2 | ||
| TMEM200B | TSL:1 | c.916C>T | p.Arg306Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000428544.1 | Q69YZ2 | ||
| TMEM200B | c.916C>T | p.Arg306Trp | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000540672.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000329 AC: 50AN: 152104Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000168 AC: 40AN: 238210 AF XY: 0.000178 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000605 AC: 877AN: 1450028Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000584 AC XY: 420AN XY: 719736 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000329 AC: 50AN: 152104Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000323 AC XY: 24AN XY: 74304 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at