chr1-33009825-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001625.4(AK2):c.*3356G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.261 in 454,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17,541 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001625.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- reticular dysgenesisInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001625.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AK2 | MANE Select | c.*3356G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000499935.1 | P54819-1 | |||
| AK2 | TSL:1 | c.*1004G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 7 of 7 | ENSP00000362548.2 | P54819-2 | |||
| AK2 | TSL:1 | c.*3356G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000346921.7 | A0A5K1VW67 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.218 AC: 33185AN: 151912Hom.: 4491 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.292 AC: 39883AN: 136480 AF XY: 0.289 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.283 AC: 85455AN: 302178Hom.: 13051 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.283 AC XY: 48826AN XY: 172232 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.218 AC: 33182AN: 152030Hom.: 4490 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.225 AC XY: 16698AN XY: 74302 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at