chr1-3412351-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_022114.4(PRDM16):c.2154G>A(p.Ser718Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000421 in 1,613,454 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000033 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

PRDM16
NM_022114.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.766

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PRDM16 (HGNC:14000): (PR/SET domain 16) The reciprocal translocation t(1;3)(p36;q21) occurs in a subset of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This gene is located near the 1p36.3 breakpoint and has been shown to be specifically expressed in the t(1:3)(p36,q21)-positive MDS/AML. The protein encoded by this gene is a zinc finger transcription factor and contains an N-terminal PR domain. The translocation results in the overexpression of a truncated version of this protein that lacks the PR domain, which may play an important role in the pathogenesis of MDS and AML. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been reported. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

PRDM16 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

left ventricular noncompaction 8
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
left ventricular noncompaction
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
dilated cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

PRDM16 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 1-3412351-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-3412351-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 517157.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.766 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 20 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022114.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	PRDM16	NM_022114.4	MANE Select	c.2154G>A	p.Ser718Ser	synonymous	Exon 9 of 17	NP_071397.3
	PRDM16	NM_199454.3		c.2154G>A	p.Ser718Ser	synonymous	Exon 9 of 17	NP_955533.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
PRDM16	ENST00000270722.10	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.2154G>A	p.Ser718Ser	synonymous	Exon 9 of 17	ENSP00000270722.5
PRDM16	ENST00000378391.6	TSL:1	c.2154G>A	p.Ser718Ser	synonymous	Exon 9 of 17	ENSP00000367643.2
PRDM16	ENST00000512462.5	TSL:1	n.1932G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 8 of 16

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000290

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000958

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000603

AC:

AN:

248614

AF XY:

0.0000593

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000129

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000869

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000994

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000709

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000328

AC:

AN:

1461266

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000344

AC XY:

AN XY:

726968

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000895

AC:

AN:

44714

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52818

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000520

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000153

AC:

AN:

1111998

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000182

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000148

AC XY:

AN XY:

74334

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000290

AC:

AN:

41444

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000958

AC:

AN:

2088

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.527

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000152

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000121

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Nov 17, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ser718Ser in exon 9 of PRDM16: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 4/66462 of Europe an chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinsti tute.org; dbSNP rs781041726).

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

May 26, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Left ventricular noncompaction 8

Benign:1

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

0.85

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.81

PhyloP100

-0.77

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over