chr1-40080393-T-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000310.4(PPT1):c.627+4A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000781 in 1,613,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00081 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

PPT1
NM_000310.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.9449

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.04

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PPT1 (HGNC:9325): (palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a small glycoprotein involved in the catabolism of lipid-modified proteins during lysosomal degradation. The encoded enzyme removes thioester-linked fatty acyl groups such as palmitate from cysteine residues. Defects in this gene are a cause of infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 1 (CLN1, or INCL) and neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 4 (CLN4). Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

PPT1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P, Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health

PPT1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.27).

BP6

Variant 1-40080393-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-40080393-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 206638.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000473 (72/152296) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0149 (72/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0122. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 52 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 13 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PPT1	NM_000310.4 link	c.627+4A>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 6 of 8	ENST00000642050.2	NP_000301.1	P50897-1
PPT1	NM_001363695.2 link	c.627+4A>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 6 of 7		NP_001350624.1
PPT1	NM_001142604.2 link	c.318+4A>G	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 3 of 5		NP_001136076.1	P50897-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PPT1	ENST00000642050.2 link	c.627+4A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 6 of 8		NM_000310.4	ENSP00000493153.1		P50897-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0149

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00181

AC:

454

AN:

251478

AF XY:

0.00241

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000814

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000814

AC:

1189

AN:

1461368

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00117

AC XY:

852

AN XY:

727044

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000504

AC:

AN:

39686

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0132

AC:

1137

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53392

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000694

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000270

AC:

AN:

1111584

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000679

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.458

Heterozygous variant carriers

176

263

351

439

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000698

AC XY:

AN XY:

74460

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41574

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0149

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.527

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000128

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000642

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00693

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Aug 16, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 15, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Apr 11, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 1

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.27

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.97

PhyloP100

5.0

Mutation Taster

=94/6

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.94

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.69

SpliceAI score (max)

0.12

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over