chr1-42738540-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_148960.3(CLDN19):āc.269T>Cā(p.Leu90Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,626 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L90R) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_148960.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDN19 | NM_148960.3 | c.269T>C | p.Leu90Pro | missense_variant | 2/5 | ENST00000296387.6 | |
CLDN19 | NM_001185117.2 | c.269T>C | p.Leu90Pro | missense_variant | 2/3 | ||
CLDN19 | NM_001123395.2 | c.269T>C | p.Leu90Pro | missense_variant | 2/4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDN19 | ENST00000296387.6 | c.269T>C | p.Leu90Pro | missense_variant | 2/5 | 2 | NM_148960.3 | ||
CLDN19 | ENST00000372539.3 | c.269T>C | p.Leu90Pro | missense_variant | 2/4 | 1 | P1 | ||
CLDN19 | ENST00000539749.5 | c.269T>C | p.Leu90Pro | missense_variant | 2/3 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461626Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727142
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Renal hypomagnesemia 5 with ocular involvement Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Nov 01, 2006 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at