chr1-55039879-A-ACTG
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_174936.4(PCSK9):c.63_65dupGCT(p.Leu22dup) variant causes a disruptive inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.141 in 1,557,874 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,501 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L22L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_174936.4 disruptive_inframe_insertion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSK9 | ENST00000302118.5 | c.63_65dupGCT | p.Leu22dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 12 | 1 | NM_174936.4 | ENSP00000303208.5 | ||
PCSK9 | ENST00000710286.1 | c.420_422dupGCT | p.Leu141dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 12 | ENSP00000518176.1 | ||||
PCSK9 | ENST00000673726.1 | n.63_65dupGCT | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 6 | ENSP00000501004.1 | |||||
PCSK9 | ENST00000673913.2 | n.63_65dupGCT | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 12 | ENSP00000501161.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.152 AC: 23110AN: 152038Hom.: 1811 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.122 AC: 19607AN: 161082Hom.: 909 AF XY: 0.123 AC XY: 10578AN XY: 86248
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.140 AC: 197297AN: 1405720Hom.: 12683 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.140 AC XY: 97431AN XY: 694280
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.152 AC: 23137AN: 152154Hom.: 1818 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.148 AC XY: 11020AN XY: 74402
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
- -
Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. c.63_65dupGCT in PCKS9 (aka c.61_63dupCTG, c.43_44insCTG, L21dup, L10, p.L15_16insL). This is an in-frame duplication of three nucleotides which results in insertion of a leucine in a 9-leucine track. The variant has been seen in at least 8 unrelated cases of familial hypercholesterolemia however it has also been observed at appreciable frequencies in individuals from the general population with normal cholesterol. Noguchi et al (2010) reported that 8 of 55 familial hypercholesterolemia patients without LDLR variants were heterozygous for this variant. No segregation or control data was provided. In total the variant has been seen in the homozygous state in 11 of 822 individuals and in the heterozygous state in 204 of 822 individuals from published reports and publicly available population datasets. The variant is listed in dbSNP as rs35574083 without minor allele frequency data. Another dbSNP entry, rs45454392, also represents a leucine insertion in the same track of leucine repeats, denoted c.44_45insGCT (p.Leu15delinsLeuLeu). These variants are likely synonymous as it would be impossible to know exactly where the insertion occurred in the repeat track and different groups would choose to number at different points in the track, but with both insertions leading to an additional leucine. The latter dbSNP entry includes minor allele frequency data from general populations samples in the Coriell repository with 2/24 African Americans being homozygotes for the insertion and 9/24 African American and 4/23 European individuals noted as heterozygotes. Chen et al (2005) reported allele frequencies for the L9, L10, and L11 variants in the Lipoprotein Coronary Atherosclerosis Study population (LCAS). The sample consistent of 372 35-75yo individuals with LDL-C levels of 115 to 190 mg/dL despite diet and one more coronary lesions of 30-75% stenosis.. Given this selection criteria this cannot be considered a general population sample, however their LDL levels indicate they likely did not have familial hypercholesterolemia. 90/372 individuals studied were heterozygotes for the L10 variant. Yue et al (2006) reported that in a general population sample with normal cholesterol phenotypes 101/403 individuals were heterozygoes for the L10 allele and 9/403 were homozygous. Unfortunately the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset only reports single nucleotide variation so no data is provided on this variant. Yue et al (2006) found that the variant is associated with lower LDL-C in a Caucasian sample with normal cholesterol. Individuals who had one 9 repeat copy and one 10 repeat copy (i.e. heterozygotes for this variant) had LDL-C that was 10-15 mg/dL lower. They found the 10 repeat variant was an independent predictor of LDL-C. Pisciotta et al (2011) compared total cholesterol LDL-C levels in familial hypercholesterolemia patients who were heterozygous for the 10 repeat variant with those who were homozygous for the wildtype 9 repeat variant and found no differences. However, in the subgroup of individuals treated with statins, the reduction in both total cholesterol and LDL-C was greater in heterozygotes for L10 than in wildtype homozygotes. -
- -
- -
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Benign:4
- -
MAF = 9% in 100 subjects with average plasma cholesterol -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:4
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29562810, 30782561, 26687699, 25239117, 23743349, 16619215, 23663650, 20006333) -
- -
- -
Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, 3 Benign:2
- -
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at