chr1-55057360-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BA1

The NM_174936.4(PCSK9):ā€‹c.1026A>Gā€‹(p.Gln342Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.997 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 802,215 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.98 ( 73721 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes š‘“: 1.0 ( 728494 hom. )

Consequence

PCSK9
NM_174936.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.988
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCSK9 (HGNC:20001): (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) This gene encodes a member of the subtilisin-like proprotein convertase family, which includes proteases that process protein and peptide precursors trafficking through regulated or constitutive branches of the secretory pathway. The encoded protein undergoes an autocatalytic processing event with its prosegment in the ER and is constitutively secreted as an inactive protease into the extracellular matrix and trans-Golgi network. It is expressed in liver, intestine and kidney tissues and escorts specific receptors for lysosomal degradation. It plays a role in cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 1-55057360-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-55057360-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 262899.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=11}. Variant chr1-55057360-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.988 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.994 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PCSK9NM_174936.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1026A>G p.Gln342Gln synonymous_variant 7/12 ENST00000302118.5 NP_777596.2 Q8NBP7-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PCSK9ENST00000302118.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1026A>G p.Gln342Gln synonymous_variant 7/121 NM_174936.4 ENSP00000303208.5 Q8NBP7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.984
AC:
149710
AN:
152208
Hom.:
73670
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.942
Gnomad AMI
AF:
1.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.996
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
1.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.997
Gnomad NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.988
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.996
AC:
250062
AN:
251170
Hom.:
124502
AF XY:
0.997
AC XY:
135373
AN XY:
135808
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.941
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.997
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.998
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.998
AC:
1459285
AN:
1461712
Hom.:
728494
Cov.:
86
AF XY:
0.999
AC XY:
726126
AN XY:
727176
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.941
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.997
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.997
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.984
AC:
149820
AN:
152326
Hom.:
73721
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.984
AC XY:
73297
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.942
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.996
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.988
Alfa
AF:
0.993
Hom.:
37730
Bravo
AF:
0.981
Asia WGS
AF:
0.997
AC:
3467
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
1.00
EpiControl
AF:
1.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, 3 Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthOct 03, 2024- -
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 02, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo JorgeMar 01, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchLaboratorium voor Moleculaire Diagnostiek Experimentele Vasculaire Geneeskunde, Academisch Medisch Centrum-- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 30, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGENinCode PLCJul 01, 2022- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCohesion PhenomicsFeb 09, 2023- -
Hypobetalipoproteinemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 08, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
7.5
DANN
Benign
0.57

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs509504; hg19: chr1-55523033; API