chr1-77929353-T-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_144573.4(NEXN):c.902T>A(p.Ile301Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000198 in 1,613,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I301V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_144573.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEXN | NM_144573.4 | c.902T>A | p.Ile301Asn | missense_variant | 9/13 | ENST00000334785.12 | NP_653174.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEXN | ENST00000334785.12 | c.902T>A | p.Ile301Asn | missense_variant | 9/13 | 1 | NM_144573.4 | ENSP00000333938.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152072Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000243 AC: 6AN: 246560Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000224 AC XY: 3AN XY: 133954
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000116 AC: 17AN: 1461424Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000110 AC XY: 8AN XY: 727004
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74418
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 28, 2019 | Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance by one other clinical laboratory (ClinVar Variant ID#409281; Landrum et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1CC;C3151267:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 20 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 18, 2022 | This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with asparagine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 301 of the NEXN protein (p.Ile301Asn). This variant is present in population databases (rs373878384, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with NEXN-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 409281). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The asparagine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 20, 2024 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at