chr1-89056075-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_002053.3(GBP1):c.1309G>T(p.Val437Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,660 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/24 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V437I) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002053.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002053.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBP1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1309G>T | p.Val437Phe | missense | Exon 8 of 11 | ENSP00000359504.4 | P32455 | ||
| GBP1 | c.1309G>T | p.Val437Phe | missense | Exon 8 of 11 | ENSP00000542794.1 | ||||
| GBP1 | c.1309G>T | p.Val437Phe | missense | Exon 8 of 11 | ENSP00000542795.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461660Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727138 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152294Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74466 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at