chr10-102918570-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 2P and 17B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_017649.5(CNNM2):c.90C>T(p.Arg30Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000114 in 1,584,112 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CNNM2
NM_017649.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.93

Variant links:

Genes affected

CNNM2 (HGNC:103): (cyclin and CBS domain divalent metal cation transport mediator 2) This gene encodes a member of the ancient conserved domain containing protein family. Members of this protein family contain a cyclin box motif and have structural similarity to the cyclins. The encoded protein may play an important role in magnesium homeostasis by mediating the epithelial transport and renal reabsorption of Mg2+. Mutations in this gene are associated with renal hypomagnesemia. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

CNNM2 links:

ENSG00000286575 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000286575 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).

BP6

Variant 10-102918570-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-102918570-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 757526.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.93 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000112 (17/152248) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00329 (17/5172). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00209. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 9 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CNNM2	NM_017649.5 link	c.90C>T	p.Arg30Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 8	ENST00000369878.9	NP_060119.3	Q9H8M5-1
CNNM2	NM_199076.3 link	c.90C>T	p.Arg30Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 7		NP_951058.1	Q9H8M5-2
CNNM2	NM_199077.3 link	c.90C>T	p.Arg30Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 2		NP_951059.1	Q9H8M5-3
LOC107984265	NR_160733.1 link	n.-235G>A		upstream_gene_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CNNM2	ENST00000369878.9 link	c.90C>T	p.Arg30Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 8	1	NM_017649.5	ENSP00000358894.3	Q9H8M5-1
CNNM2	ENST00000369875.3 link	c.90C>T	p.Arg30Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 2	1		ENSP00000358891.3	Q9H8M5-3
CNNM2	ENST00000433628.2 link	c.90C>T	p.Arg30Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 7	2		ENSP00000392875.2	Q9H8M5-2
ENSG00000286575	ENST00000652934.1 link	n.-235G>A		upstream_gene_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152130

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00328

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000214

AC:

AN:

191240

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000234

AC XY:

AN XY:

106698

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00282

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000118

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000213

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000114

AC:

163

AN:

1431864

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

711072

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00427

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

9.08e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000507

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152248

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00329

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000518

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000106

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal hypomagnesemia 6

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Oct 29, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.47

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.96

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over