chr10-104073241-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000494.4(COL17A1):c.384T>C(p.Ser128Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00294 in 1,613,848 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 132 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000494.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0164 AC: 2495AN: 152126Hom.: 70 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00403 AC: 1013AN: 251436 AF XY: 0.00277 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00153 AC: 2243AN: 1461604Hom.: 62 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00135 AC XY: 984AN XY: 727118 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0164 AC: 2497AN: 152244Hom.: 70 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0157 AC XY: 1171AN XY: 74434 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Junctional epidermolysis bullosa, non-Herlitz type Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at