chr10-110781662-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.1053C>T(p.Asp351Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000051 in 1,548,314 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000048 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RBM20
NM_001134363.3 synonymous
NM_001134363.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.14
Genes affected
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 10-110781662-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110781662-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 298791.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}. Variant chr10-110781662-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr10-110781662-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.14 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000788 (12/152354) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00231 (12/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00133. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 8 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 12 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | NM_001134363.3 | c.1053C>T | p.Asp351Asp | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | ENST00000369519.4 | NP_001127835.2 | |
RBM20 | XM_017016103.3 | c.888C>T | p.Asp296Asp | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | XP_016871592.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_017016104.3 | c.669C>T | p.Asp223Asp | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | XP_016871593.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_047425116.1 | c.669C>T | p.Asp223Asp | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | XP_047281072.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | ENST00000369519.4 | c.1053C>T | p.Asp351Asp | synonymous_variant | 2/14 | 1 | NM_001134363.3 | ENSP00000358532.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152236Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
152236
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000324 AC: 50AN: 154250Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000306 AC XY: 25AN XY: 81574
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
50
AN:
154250
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
81574
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000480 AC: 67AN: 1395960Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000392 AC XY: 27AN XY: 687952
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
67
AN:
1395960
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
687952
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152354Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74504
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
152354
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74504
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2022 | RBM20: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Sep 24, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 03, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at