chr10-119677142-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_004281.4(BAG3):c.1588G>A(p.Val530Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000294 in 1,614,014 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004281.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | NM_004281.4 | c.1588G>A | p.Val530Met | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000369085.8 | NP_004272.2 | |
BAG3 | XM_005270287.2 | c.1585G>A | p.Val529Met | missense_variant | 4/4 | XP_005270344.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | ENST00000369085.8 | c.1588G>A | p.Val530Met | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_004281.4 | ENSP00000358081 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000135 AC: 34AN: 251394Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000155 AC XY: 21AN XY: 135878
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000310 AC: 453AN: 1461866Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000290 AC XY: 211AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74322
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 21, 2019 | Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Reported in ClinVar (ClinVar Variant ID# 162787; Landrum et al., 2016) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 16, 2020 | The BAG3 c.1588G>A; p.Val530Met variant (rs144678100), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 162787). This variant is listed in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) with a frequency of 0.03 percent in the European Non-Finnish population (identified on 41 out of 282,784 chromosomes). The threonine at position 530 is moderately conserved and computational analyses of the effects of the p.Val530Met variant on protein structure and function is neutral (SIFT: tolerated, PolyPhen-2: benign). Altogether, there is not enough evidence to classify the p.Val530Met variant with certainty. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Jul 07, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 03, 2013 | Val530Met in exon 4 of BAG3: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of note , multiple mammals, including primates, carry a methionine (Met) at this positio n despite high nearby amino acid conservation. In addition, computational analys es (AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, SIFT) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to th e protein. The Val530Met variant has also been identified in 4/8600 European Ame rican chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washingto n.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs144678100). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 02, 2022 | - - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 530 of the BAG3 protein (p.Val530Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs144678100, gnomAD 0.03%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BAG3-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 162787). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BAG3 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 16, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at