chr10-15607699-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003638.3(ITGA8):c.1742A>C(p.Gln581Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.08 in 1,613,564 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,873 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003638.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- renal hypodysplasia/aplasia 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- bilateral renal agenesisInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITGA8 | NM_003638.3 | c.1742A>C | p.Gln581Pro | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 30 | ENST00000378076.4 | NP_003629.2 | |
| ITGA8 | NM_001291494.2 | c.1697A>C | p.Gln566Pro | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 29 | NP_001278423.1 | ||
| ITGA8 | XM_011519752.3 | c.1742A>C | p.Gln581Pro | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 24 | XP_011518054.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0630 AC: 9583AN: 152166Hom.: 393 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0686 AC: 17207AN: 250954 AF XY: 0.0697 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0818 AC: 119539AN: 1461280Hom.: 5480 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0807 AC XY: 58683AN XY: 726972 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0629 AC: 9586AN: 152284Hom.: 393 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0628 AC XY: 4679AN XY: 74458 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at