chr10-16824238-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS1BS2
The NM_001081.4(CUBN):c.*737T>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00598 in 151,714 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0060 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
CUBN
NM_001081.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_001081.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.347
Genes affected
CUBN (HGNC:2548): (cubilin) Cubilin (CUBN) acts as a receptor for intrinsic factor-vitamin B12 complexes. The role of receptor is supported by the presence of 27 CUB domains. Cubulin is located within the epithelium of intestine and kidney. Mutations in CUBN may play a role in autosomal recessive megaloblastic anemia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.93).
BP6
Variant 10-16824238-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-16824238-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 299328.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00598 (907/151714) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.021 (869/41400). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0198. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 433 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUBN | NM_001081.4 | c.*737T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 67/67 | ENST00000377833.10 | ||
CUBN | XM_011519709.3 | c.*737T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 41/41 | |||
CUBN | XM_011519710.3 | c.*737T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 41/41 | |||
CUBN | XM_011519711.4 | c.*737T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 40/40 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUBN | ENST00000377833.10 | c.*737T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 67/67 | 1 | NM_001081.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00599 AC: 908AN: 151592Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
908
AN:
151592
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 66Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 42
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
66
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
42
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00598 AC: 907AN: 151714Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00584 AC XY: 433AN XY: 74136
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
907
AN:
151714
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
433
AN XY:
74136
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Imerslund-Grasbeck syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at