chr10-26068818-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):​c.1104C>T​(p.Tyr368=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.52 in 1,585,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 220,702 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.47 ( 17865 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.53 ( 202837 hom. )

Consequence

MYO3A
NM_017433.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.123
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO3A (HGNC:7601): (myosin IIIA) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the myosin superfamily. Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins and are categorized into conventional myosins (class II) and unconventional myosins (classes I and III through XV) based on their variable C-terminal cargo-binding domains. Class III myosins, such as this one, have a kinase domain N-terminal to the conserved N-terminal motor domains and are expressed in photoreceptors. The protein encoded by this gene plays an important role in hearing in humans. Three different recessive, loss of function mutations in the encoded protein have been shown to cause nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Expression of this gene is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
BP6
Variant 10-26068818-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-26068818-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45796.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-26068818-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.123 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.55 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYO3ANM_017433.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1104C>T p.Tyr368= synonymous_variant 12/35 ENST00000642920.2 NP_059129.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO3AENST00000642920.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1104C>T p.Tyr368= synonymous_variant 12/35 NM_017433.5 ENSP00000495965 P1Q8NEV4-1
MYO3AENST00000543632.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1104C>T p.Tyr368= synonymous_variant 11/171 ENSP00000445909
MYO3AENST00000642197.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1308C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 12/27
MYO3AENST00000647478.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1104C>T p.Tyr368= synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 11/30 ENSP00000493932

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.475
AC:
71993
AN:
151654
Hom.:
17861
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.359
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.433
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.410
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.533
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.271
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.493
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.578
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.602
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.555
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.476
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.478
AC:
119851
AN:
250570
Hom.:
30357
AF XY:
0.490
AC XY:
66311
AN XY:
135448
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.353
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.528
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.271
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.482
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.579
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.553
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.504
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.525
AC:
752551
AN:
1433324
Hom.:
202837
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.526
AC XY:
375451
AN XY:
714322
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.356
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.330
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.520
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.262
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.482
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.575
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.549
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.513
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.474
AC:
72009
AN:
151770
Hom.:
17865
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.474
AC XY:
35133
AN XY:
74148
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.359
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.409
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.533
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.271
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.492
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.578
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.555
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.476
Alfa
AF:
0.534
Hom.:
8782
Bravo
AF:
0.451
Asia WGS
AF:
0.397
AC:
1380
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.556
EpiControl
AF:
0.560

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 09, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Tyr368Tyr in Exon 12 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 49.1% (3446/7020) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequen cing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs35379457). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
2.4
DANN
Benign
0.44

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35379457; hg19: chr10-26357747; COSMIC: COSV56322248; API