chr10-43106382-G-A

Variant names:

• chr10-43106382-G-A
• rs34682185
• NM_020975.6:c.874G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS1 BS2

The NM_020975.6(RET):​c.874G>A​(p.Val292Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000227 in 1,610,770 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 (1 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 (4 hom.)
• Consequence: RET NM_020975.6 missense
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6 B:11 O:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 6.73

Genes affected

RET (HGNC:9967): (ret proto-oncogene) This gene encodes a transmembrane receptor and member of the tyrosine protein kinase family of proteins. Binding of ligands such as GDNF (glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor) and other related proteins to the encoded receptor stimulates receptor dimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways that play a role in cell differentiation, growth, migration and survival. The encoded receptor is important in development of the nervous system, and the development of organs and tissues derived from the neural crest. This proto-oncogene can undergo oncogenic activation through both cytogenetic rearrangement and activating point mutations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hirschsprung disease and central hypoventilation syndrome and have been identified in patients with renal agenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2017]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010467678).
• BP6: Variant 10-43106382-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-43106382-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 24880.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Benign=4, Likely_benign=7, not_provided=1}.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000368 (56/152320) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00946 (49/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00735. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 28 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RET	NM_020975.6	c.874G>A	p.Val292Met	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 20	ENST00000355710.8	NP_066124.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RET	ENST00000355710.8	c.874G>A	p.Val292Met	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 20	5	NM_020975.6	ENSP00000347942.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000361 AC: 55 AN: 152202 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000241

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00924

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000625 AC: 154 AN: 246360 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000612 AC XY: 82 AN XY: 133944

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000125

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00700

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000360

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000539

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000496

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000212 AC: 309 AN: 1458450 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000218 AC XY: 158 AN XY: 725624

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000179

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0000765

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00378

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000441

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000196

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000621

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000647

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000368 AC: 56 AN: 152320 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000376 AC XY: 28 AN XY: 74482

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00946

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000267 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000306

ExAC AF: 0.000527 AC: 64

Asia WGS AF: 0.00260 AC: 9 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000109

EpiControl AF: 0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6 Benign:11 Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4 Benign:2

Oct 01, 2017

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is denoted RET c.874G>A at the cDNA level, p.Val292Met (V292M) at the protein level, andresults in the change of a Valine to a Methionine (GTG>ATG). This variant was observed in at least one individual withpheochromocytoma and medullary thyroid cancer and four individuals with Hirschsprung disease (Castellone 2010, So2011, Ngo 2012). This variant has also been identified in 1/62 healthy East Asian individuals undergoing wholegenome sequencing (Bodian 2014). Of note, the participants in this study were younger than 50 years old thus theunaffected status of this individual may not be significant. RET Val292Met was observed at an allele frequency of0.624% (52/8336) in individuals of East Asian ancestry in large population cohorts (NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project,The 1000 Genomes Consortium 2015, Lek 2016).Since Valine and Methionine share similar properties, this is considered a conservative amino acid substitution. RETVal292Met occurs at a position that is conserved across species and is located in the extracellular topological domainand cadherin domain (Garcia-Barcelo 2004). In silico analyses are inconsistent regarding the effect this variant mayhave on protein structure and function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether RET Val292Met isa pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Apr 12, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 04, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2 Other:1

Jun 19, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The frequency of this variant in the general population (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. This variant has been seen where an alternate explanation for disease was also identified (PMID: 21655256; 32989896). This variant does not segregate with disease in at least one family (PMID: 32989896). Assessment of experimental evidence suggests this variant results in abnormal protein function (PMID: 20039896). -

Mar 02, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Jul 16, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 02, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B Uncertain:1

Nov 21, 2018

Equipe Genetique des Anomalies du Developpement, Université de Bourgogne

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Pheochromocytoma Benign:1

Jun 04, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1

Jun 04, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Renal hypodysplasia/aplasia 1 Benign:1

Jun 04, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia Benign:1

Jun 04, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary cancer Benign:1

Jan 23, 2024

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.12
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.098	T
BayesDel_noAF	Uncertain	0.090
CADD	Uncertain	25
DANN	Uncertain	1.0
DEOGEN2	Uncertain	0.47	T;.;.
Eigen	Uncertain	0.40
Eigen_PC	Uncertain	0.29
FATHMM_MKL	Uncertain	0.85	D
LIST_S2	Benign	0.68	T;T;T
MetaRNN	Benign	0.010	T;T;T
MetaSVM	Uncertain	0.42	D
MutationAssessor	Uncertain	2.6	M;.;M
PrimateAI	Uncertain	0.56	T
PROVEAN	Benign	-1.1	N;.;N
REVEL	Uncertain	0.41
Sift	Uncertain	0.0020	D;.;D
Sift4G	Uncertain	0.032	D;T;D
Polyphen		1.0	D;.;D
Vest4		0.56
MVP		0.89
MPC		1.8
ClinPred		0.060	T
GERP RS		4.9
Varity_R		0.18
gMVP		0.79

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.010		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34682185; hg19: chr10-43601830; COSMIC: COSV60697066; COSMIC: COSV60697066;