chr10-43106485-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_020975.6(RET):āc.977A>Gā(p.Gln326Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000174 in 1,613,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020975.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RET | NM_020975.6 | c.977A>G | p.Gln326Arg | missense_variant | 5/20 | ENST00000355710.8 | NP_066124.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RET | ENST00000355710.8 | c.977A>G | p.Gln326Arg | missense_variant | 5/20 | 5 | NM_020975.6 | ENSP00000347942 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000803 AC: 2AN: 249132Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000740 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135084
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000164 AC: 24AN: 1461424Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000138 AC XY: 10AN XY: 727010
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | May 26, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 18, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 02, 2022 | This sequence change replaces glutamine, which is neutral and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 326 of the RET protein (p.Gln326Arg). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.002%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RET-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 216731). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The arginine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Oct 30, 2023 | This missense variant replaces glutamine with arginine at codon 326 of the RET protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with cutaneous melanoma and at least two independent additional primary cancers (PMID: 29641532). This variant has been identified in 4/280482 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A;C0025269:Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B;C0031511:Pheochromocytoma;C1833921:Familial medullary thyroid carcinoma;C3888239:Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 19, 2022 | - - |
Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Jun 30, 2023 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 14, 2022 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 04, 2022 | The p.Q326R variant (also known as c.977A>G), located in coding exon 5 of the RET gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 977. The glutamine at codon 326 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration was identified in 1/1358 non-cancer control individuals and in 0/57 cases, in a study looking at cancer predisposition mutations in patients with cutaneous melanoma and a history of at least two additional non-cutaneous melanoma primary cancers (Pritchard AL et al. PLoS One. 2018 Apr;13:e0194098). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at