chr10-43111279-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_020975.6(RET):āc.1336G>Cā(p.Gly446Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000442 in 1,614,172 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020975.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RET | NM_020975.6 | c.1336G>C | p.Gly446Arg | missense_variant | 7/20 | ENST00000355710.8 | NP_066124.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RET | ENST00000355710.8 | c.1336G>C | p.Gly446Arg | missense_variant | 7/20 | 5 | NM_020975.6 | ENSP00000347942 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00219 AC: 333AN: 152236Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000589 AC: 148AN: 251446Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000434 AC XY: 59AN XY: 135908
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000261 AC: 382AN: 1461818Hom.: 1 Cov.: 58 AF XY: 0.000234 AC XY: 170AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00218 AC: 332AN: 152354Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00199 AC XY: 148AN XY: 74510
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 03, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 20, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 26, 2020 | Variant summary: RET c.1336G>C (p.Gly446Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the RET cadherin-like domain 4 (IPR041317) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0008 in 282840 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0083 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 200 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RET causing Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 phenotype (3.7e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and all of them classified the variant as benign (4x) / likely benign (4x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 14, 2016 | p.Gly446Arg in exon 7 of RET: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 0.8% (87/10400) of African chromosome s by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbS NP rs115423919). - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 03, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 03, 2018 | - - |
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 17, 2022 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 23, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 18, 2020 | - - |
Pheochromocytoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 22, 2015 | - - |
Renal hypodysplasia/aplasia 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Multiple endocrine neoplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at