chr10-43111279-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_020975.6(RET):ā€‹c.1336G>Cā€‹(p.Gly446Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000442 in 1,614,172 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0022 ( 1 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00026 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RET
NM_020975.6 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.899
Variant links:
Genes affected
RET (HGNC:9967): (ret proto-oncogene) This gene encodes a transmembrane receptor and member of the tyrosine protein kinase family of proteins. Binding of ligands such as GDNF (glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor) and other related proteins to the encoded receptor stimulates receptor dimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways that play a role in cell differentiation, growth, migration and survival. The encoded receptor is important in development of the nervous system, and the development of organs and tissues derived from the neural crest. This proto-oncogene can undergo oncogenic activation through both cytogenetic rearrangement and activating point mutations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hirschsprung disease and central hypoventilation syndrome and have been identified in patients with renal agenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004567325).
BP6
Variant 10-43111279-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-43111279-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 135187.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RETNM_020975.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1336G>C p.Gly446Arg missense_variant 7/20 ENST00000355710.8 NP_066124.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RETENST00000355710.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1336G>C p.Gly446Arg missense_variant 7/205 NM_020975.6 ENSP00000347942 P4P07949-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00219
AC:
333
AN:
152236
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00755
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000589
AC:
148
AN:
251446
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000434
AC XY:
59
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00806
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000405
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000261
AC:
382
AN:
1461818
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
58
AF XY:
0.000234
AC XY:
170
AN XY:
727218
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00953
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000537
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000144
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000348
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00218
AC:
332
AN:
152354
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00199
AC XY:
148
AN XY:
74510
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00750
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.000417
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00257
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00726
AC:
32
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000733
AC:
89
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 20, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 26, 2020Variant summary: RET c.1336G>C (p.Gly446Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the RET cadherin-like domain 4 (IPR041317) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0008 in 282840 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0083 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 200 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RET causing Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 phenotype (3.7e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and all of them classified the variant as benign (4x) / likely benign (4x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 14, 2016p.Gly446Arg in exon 7 of RET: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 0.8% (87/10400) of African chromosome s by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbS NP rs115423919). -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 03, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMay 03, 2018- -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylDec 22, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 17, 2022- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 23, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Dec 18, 2020- -
Pheochromocytoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylDec 22, 2015- -
Renal hypodysplasia/aplasia 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.38
CADD
Benign
7.4
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.36
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.75
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.79
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.38
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.77
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.072
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0046
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.80
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.47
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Benign
0.058
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;T
Polyphen
0.76
P;P
Vest4
0.32
MVP
0.35
MPC
0.33
ClinPred
0.0052
T
GERP RS
2.0
Varity_R
0.091
gMVP
0.43

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs115423919; hg19: chr10-43606727; API