chr10-49470838-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000124.4(ERCC6):c.3122A>C(p.Gln1041Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00219 in 1,614,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. Q1041Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000124.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Cockayne spectrum with or without cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Cockayne syndrome type 2Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- UV-sensitive syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- COFS syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- UV-sensitive syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- premature ovarian failure 11Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00175 AC: 267AN: 152246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00175 AC: 440AN: 251060 AF XY: 0.00155 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00223 AC: 3265AN: 1461788Hom.: 4 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00207 AC XY: 1507AN XY: 727190 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00175 AC: 267AN: 152364Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00166 AC XY: 124AN XY: 74506 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
The ERCC6 p.Gln1041Pro variant was identified in the literature in 1 of 28 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.036) from individuals with a positive history of cancer (proband had colon cancer) (Castellanos_2017_PMID:28051113). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139007661), LOVD 3.0 and ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, likely benign by Illumina and uncertain significance by Claritas Genomics, Genetics Services Laboratory University of Chicago, Fulgent Genetics, EGL Genetic Diagnostics and GeneDx). The variant was identified in control databases in 492 of 282474 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001742 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 102 of 35408 chromosomes (freq: 0.002881), Other in 20 of 7200 chromosomes (freq: 0.002778), European (non-Finnish) in 317 of 128972 chromosomes (freq: 0.002458), Ashkenazi Jewish in 22 of 10362 chromosomes (freq: 0.002123), European (Finnish) in 15 of 25090 chromosomes (freq: 0.000598), African in 13 of 24904 chromosomes (freq: 0.000522), South Asian in 3 of 30588 chromosomes (freq: 0.000098), but was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Gln1041 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
ERCC6: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29602769, 24036952, 28051113) -
- -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Variant summary: ERCC6 c.3122A>C (p.Gln1041Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0018 in 251060 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency is approximately 1.12 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ERCC6 causing Cockayne Syndrome phenotype (0.0016), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Although reported in the literature, to our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3122A>C in individuals affected with Cockayne Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (benign/likely benign, n=3; VUS, n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
- -
- -
Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1;C0265201:DE SANCTIS-CACCHIONE SYNDROME;C0684249:Lung carcinoma;C0751038:Cockayne syndrome type 2;C3151063:Age related macular degeneration 5;C3551173:UV-sensitive syndrome 1;C4310783:Premature ovarian failure 11 Uncertain:1
- -
DE SANCTIS-CACCHIONE SYNDROME Uncertain:1
- -
COFS syndrome Benign:1
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Cone-rod dystrophy Benign:1
- -
Cockayne syndrome Benign:1
- -
Intellectual disability Benign:1
- -
Macular degeneration Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at