chr10-49532815-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP3BP6BS2

The NM_000124.4(ERCC6):​c.150G>A​(p.Val50Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00119 in 1,614,222 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00070 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC6
NM_000124.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.226
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC6 (HGNC:3438): (ERCC excision repair 6, chromatin remodeling factor) This gene encodes a DNA-binding protein that is important in transcription-coupled excision repair. The encoded protein has ATP-stimulated ATPase activity, interacts with several transcription and excision repair proteins, and may promote complex formation at DNA repair sites. Mutations in this gene are associated with Cockayne syndrome type B and cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1. Alternative splicing occurs between a splice site from exon 5 of this gene to the 3' splice site upstream of the open reading frame (ORF) of the adjacent gene, piggyback-derived-3 (GeneID:267004), which activates the alternative polyadenylation site downstream of the piggyback-derived-3 ORF. The resulting transcripts encode a fusion protein that shares sequence with the product of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PP3
Splicing scoreres supports a deletorius effect: Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.
BP6
Variant 10-49532815-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-49532815-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 190149.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr10-49532815-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC6NM_000124.4 linkc.150G>A p.Val50Val synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 21 ENST00000355832.10 NP_000115.1 Q03468-1Q59FF6
ERCC6NM_001277058.2 linkc.150G>A p.Val50Val synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 6 ENST00000447839.7 NP_001263987.1 P0DP91-1A8K4Q3
ERCC6NM_001346440.2 linkc.150G>A p.Val50Val synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 21 NP_001333369.1 Q03468-1
ERCC6NM_001277059.2 linkc.150G>A p.Val50Val synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 6 NP_001263988.1 P0DP91-1A8K4Q3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC6ENST00000355832.10 linkc.150G>A p.Val50Val synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 21 1 NM_000124.4 ENSP00000348089.5 Q03468-1
ERCC6ENST00000447839.7 linkc.150G>A p.Val50Val synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 6 2 NM_001277058.2 ENSP00000387966.2 P0DP91-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000696
AC:
106
AN:
152216
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000815
AC:
205
AN:
251456
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000750
AC XY:
102
AN XY:
135916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000434
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00130
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00124
AC:
1810
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00118
AC XY:
855
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000626
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000225
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00153
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00111
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000696
AC:
106
AN:
152334
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000564
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000523
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00126
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000474
Alfa
AF:
0.00108
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000722
EpiCase
AF:
0.00136
EpiControl
AF:
0.00148

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 31, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, suggests this variant may impact gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19894250) -

Feb 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

ERCC6: PP3 -

not specified Benign:1
Sep 21, 2012
Claritas Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Age related macular degeneration 5 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Cockayne syndrome type 2 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.48
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.69
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
0.69
Position offset: -2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80133923; hg19: chr10-50740861; API