chr10-53822469-TAGG-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP6BS2
The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):c.5254_5256delCCT(p.Pro1752del) variant causes a conservative inframe deletion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00212 in 1,599,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 6 hom. )
Consequence
PCDH15
NM_033056.4 conservative_inframe_deletion
NM_033056.4 conservative_inframe_deletion
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.11
Genes affected
PCDH15 (HGNC:14674): (protocadherin related 15) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily. Family members encode integral membrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. It plays an essential role in maintenance of normal retinal and cochlear function. Mutations in this gene result in hearing loss and Usher Syndrome Type IF (USH1F). Extensive alternative splicing resulting in multiple isoforms has been observed in the mouse ortholog. Similar alternatively spliced transcripts are inferred to occur in human, and additional variants are likely to occur. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 10-53822469-TAGG-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-53822469-TAGG-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 46488.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr10-53822469-TAGG-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr10-53822469-TAGG-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,Digenic gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | NM_033056.4 | c.5254_5256delCCT | p.Pro1752del | conservative_inframe_deletion | 33/33 | ENST00000320301.11 | NP_149045.3 | |
PCDH15 | NM_001384140.1 | c.4368-2242_4368-2240delCCT | intron_variant | ENST00000644397.2 | NP_001371069.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | ENST00000320301.11 | c.5254_5256delCCT | p.Pro1752del | conservative_inframe_deletion | 33/33 | 1 | NM_033056.4 | ENSP00000322604.6 | ||
PCDH15 | ENST00000644397.2 | c.4368-2242_4368-2240delCCT | intron_variant | NM_001384140.1 | ENSP00000495195.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00163 AC: 238AN: 145734Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
238
AN:
145734
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00154 AC: 361AN: 233792Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00167 AC XY: 213AN XY: 127368
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
361
AN:
233792
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
213
AN XY:
127368
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00217 AC: 3152AN: 1453312Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00225 AC XY: 1623AN XY: 722634
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3152
AN:
1453312
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1623
AN XY:
722634
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00163 AC: 238AN: 145844Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00156 AC XY: 111AN XY: 71058
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
238
AN:
145844
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
111
AN XY:
71058
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 25, 2023 | See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | PCDH15: BS1:Supporting, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 14, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Hearing loss, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa-deafness syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 07, 2013 | p.Pro1752del in exon 33 of PCDH15: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been seen in 0.6% (5/878) of control chromosomes (S tabej 2012) and results in an in-frame deletion of a Pro residue in a non-conser ved proline tract. - |
PCDH15-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 16, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 25, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at