chr10-53822876-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):c.4850A>G(p.Asn1617Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00891 in 1,614,112 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 81 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N1617D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033056.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 23Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 1FInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCDH15 | ENST00000320301.11 | c.4850A>G | p.Asn1617Ser | missense_variant | Exon 33 of 33 | 1 | NM_033056.4 | ENSP00000322604.6 | ||
| PCDH15 | ENST00000644397.2 | c.4368-2646A>G | intron_variant | Intron 32 of 37 | NM_001384140.1 | ENSP00000495195.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00612 AC: 931AN: 152186Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00541 AC: 1361AN: 251424 AF XY: 0.00538 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00920 AC: 13454AN: 1461808Hom.: 72 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00898 AC XY: 6531AN XY: 727202 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00611 AC: 931AN: 152304Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00564 AC XY: 420AN XY: 74472 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
- -
PCDH15: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:4
- -
Asn1617Ser in exon 33 of PCDH15: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.7%(32/4548)of control chromosome s. In addition, computational analyses (PolyPhen2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not sugge st a high likelihood of impact to the protein primarily based upon a lack of con servation across species including mammals. Of note, mouse, rat, chick, platypus and lizard has a serine at this position. -
- -
- -
Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:2
- -
- -
Usher syndrome type 1D;C1836027:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 23;C1865885:Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:1
- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at