chr10-53940903-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):āc.3195A>Gā(p.Gln1065=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000372 in 1,613,590 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0000027 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
PCDH15
NM_033056.4 synonymous
NM_033056.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.956
Genes affected
PCDH15 (HGNC:14674): (protocadherin related 15) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily. Family members encode integral membrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. It plays an essential role in maintenance of normal retinal and cochlear function. Mutations in this gene result in hearing loss and Usher Syndrome Type IF (USH1F). Extensive alternative splicing resulting in multiple isoforms has been observed in the mouse ortholog. Similar alternatively spliced transcripts are inferred to occur in human, and additional variants are likely to occur. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 10-53940903-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-53940903-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 300183.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.956 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | NM_033056.4 | c.3195A>G | p.Gln1065= | synonymous_variant | 24/33 | ENST00000320301.11 | NP_149045.3 | |
PCDH15 | NM_001384140.1 | c.3195A>G | p.Gln1065= | synonymous_variant | 24/38 | ENST00000644397.2 | NP_001371069.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | ENST00000320301.11 | c.3195A>G | p.Gln1065= | synonymous_variant | 24/33 | 1 | NM_033056.4 | ENSP00000322604 | ||
PCDH15 | ENST00000644397.2 | c.3195A>G | p.Gln1065= | synonymous_variant | 24/38 | NM_001384140.1 | ENSP00000495195 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251304Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135824
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
251304
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135824
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461406Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727012
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
1461406
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
727012
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74352
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74352
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 09, 2016 | p.Gln1065Gln in exon 24 of PCDH15: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 1/66596 Europea n chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstit ute.org; dbSNP rs776720353). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 09, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at