chr10-54236848-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_033056.4(PCDH15):​c.960A>G​(p.Pro320Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0292 in 1,613,256 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 951 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.025 ( 62 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.030 ( 889 hom. )

Consequence

PCDH15
NM_033056.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.818

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCDH15 (HGNC:14674): (protocadherin related 15) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily. Family members encode integral membrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion. It plays an essential role in maintenance of normal retinal and cochlear function. Mutations in this gene result in hearing loss and Usher Syndrome Type IF (USH1F). Extensive alternative splicing resulting in multiple isoforms has been observed in the mouse ortholog. Similar alternatively spliced transcripts are inferred to occur in human, and additional variants are likely to occur. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
PCDH15 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 23
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • Usher syndrome type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 1F
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).
BP6
Variant 10-54236848-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-54236848-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 46513.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.818 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0715 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PCDH15NM_033056.4 linkc.960A>G p.Pro320Pro synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 33 ENST00000320301.11 NP_149045.3 Q96QU1-1
PCDH15NM_001384140.1 linkc.960A>G p.Pro320Pro synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 38 ENST00000644397.2 NP_001371069.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PCDH15ENST00000320301.11 linkc.960A>G p.Pro320Pro synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 33 1 NM_033056.4 ENSP00000322604.6 Q96QU1-1
PCDH15ENST00000644397.2 linkc.960A>G p.Pro320Pro synonymous_variant Exon 9 of 38 NM_001384140.1 ENSP00000495195.1 A0A2R8Y6C0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0253
AC:
3851
AN:
152138
Hom.:
63
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0214
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0362
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0344
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00893
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0784
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0206
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0301
AC:
7560
AN:
251394
AF XY:
0.0326
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0195
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0394
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00962
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0257
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0248
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0297
AC:
43321
AN:
1461000
Hom.:
889
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0311
AC XY:
22580
AN XY:
726864
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0192
AC:
641
AN:
33458
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0353
AC:
1577
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00957
AC:
250
AN:
26120
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00129
AC:
51
AN:
39658
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0809
AC:
6978
AN:
86224
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0165
AC:
881
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0245
AC:
141
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0281
AC:
31189
AN:
1111274
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0267
AC:
1613
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2047
4094
6140
8187
10234
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1264
2528
3792
5056
6320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0253
AC:
3859
AN:
152256
Hom.:
62
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0263
AC XY:
1959
AN XY:
74430
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0216
AC:
896
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0343
AC:
524
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00893
AC:
31
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00154
AC:
8
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0780
AC:
376
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0148
AC:
157
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0263
AC:
1787
AN:
67978
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0208
AC:
44
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
195
390
585
780
975
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
52
104
156
208
260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0256
Hom.:
113
Bravo
AF:
0.0240
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0400
AC:
141
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0244
EpiControl
AF:
0.0207

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Mar 20, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:2
Jul 14, 2010
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Pro320Pro in exon 9 of PCDH15: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction and is listed in dbSNP (rs41274634 - no frequency data availabl e). -

Mar 26, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1F Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
CADD
Benign
4.2
DANN
Benign
0.62
PhyloP100
-0.82
Mutation Taster
=87/13
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs41274634; hg19: chr10-55996608; API