chr10-68166568-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_032578.4(MYPN):c.1875C>T(p.Pro625=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.177 in 1,613,890 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26,627 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2468 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.18 ( 24159 hom. )
Consequence
MYPN
NM_032578.4 synonymous
NM_032578.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.56
Genes affected
MYPN (HGNC:23246): (myopalladin) Striated muscle in vertebrates comprises large proteins which must be organized properly to contract efficiently. Z-lines in striated muscle are a sign of this organization, representing the ends of actin thin filaments, titin, nebulin or nebulette and accessory proteins required for structure and function. This gene encodes a protein which interacts with nebulin in skeletal muscle or nebulette in cardiac muscle and alpha-actinin. In addition, this gene product can interact with a protein with the I-band indicating it has a regulatory as well as structural function. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 10-68166568-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-68166568-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 31796.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-68166568-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-68166568-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.56 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.197 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYPN | NM_032578.4 | c.1875C>T | p.Pro625= | synonymous_variant | 10/20 | ENST00000358913.10 | NP_115967.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYPN | ENST00000358913.10 | c.1875C>T | p.Pro625= | synonymous_variant | 10/20 | 1 | NM_032578.4 | ENSP00000351790 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.174 AC: 26371AN: 151958Hom.: 2457 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
26371
AN:
151958
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.188 AC: 47270AN: 251328Hom.: 4857 AF XY: 0.187 AC XY: 25423AN XY: 135832
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
47270
AN:
251328
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
25423
AN XY:
135832
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.177 AC: 259468AN: 1461812Hom.: 24159 Cov.: 76 AF XY: 0.178 AC XY: 129645AN XY: 727212
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
259468
AN:
1461812
Hom.:
Cov.:
76
AF XY:
AC XY:
129645
AN XY:
727212
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.174 AC: 26413AN: 152078Hom.: 2468 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.175 AC XY: 13002AN XY: 74330
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
26413
AN:
152078
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
13002
AN XY:
74330
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
491
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 29, 2014 | p.Pro625Pro in exon 11 of MYPN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 19% (1605/8600) of European America n chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.ed u/EVS/; dbSNP rs2673793). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | May 13, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 22, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 09, 2023 | - - |
not provided Benign:1Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | curation | Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (MYPN) | Apr 27, 2012 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1KK Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 12, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at