chr10-69405055-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001057.3(TACR2):c.968G>A(p.Arg323His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00212 in 1,613,734 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001057.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACR2 | NM_001057.3 | c.968G>A | p.Arg323His | missense_variant | 5/5 | ENST00000373306.5 | NP_001048.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TACR2 | ENST00000373306.5 | c.968G>A | p.Arg323His | missense_variant | 5/5 | 1 | NM_001057.3 | ENSP00000362403.4 | ||
TACR2 | ENST00000373307.5 | c.332G>A | p.Arg111His | missense_variant | 3/3 | 2 | ENSP00000362404.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00312 AC: 475AN: 152122Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00322 AC: 799AN: 248354Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00384 AC XY: 517AN XY: 134468
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00202 AC: 2953AN: 1461494Hom.: 32 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00242 AC XY: 1757AN XY: 727052
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00312 AC: 475AN: 152240Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00359 AC XY: 267AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 18, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at